W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Criterion

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 11:12:42 -0500
To: "'GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000801c11dc9$74dc2120$066fa8c0@750>
From our last teleconf call,

The decision was that  the "criteria"  would be normative.
Hence the need to review and pass them very carefully.
The examples would NOT be normative.

As to technology agnostic or not....
I think that some will be agnostic (and would be in the main doc) and
some would not (and would therefore have to move to the technology
specific doc)

Right now it is mixed.  Which is why the review.

-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Human Factors
Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
Director - Trace R & D Center
Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/>
FAX 608/262-8848 
For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Kynn Bartlett
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 10:23 AM
To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU
Cc: Charles McCathieNevile; Gregg Vanderheiden; GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL
- WAI Guidelines WG)
Subject: Re: Criterion

Should criteria be technology-specific or technology-agnostic?

Are criteria normative or non-normative?


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
Tel +1 949-567-7006
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2001 12:19:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:38 UTC