W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:00:43 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010730064406.009fb850@pop.erols.com>
To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Let checkpoint 3.4 read as follows:

Illustrate text content with related content in other modalities such as 
graphic images (drawings, photos, etc.) and animations, multi-media, and 
sound files.

This is easily machine testable by testing for the presence of non-text 
content. The second step of testing, to determine if the non-text content 
is illustrative of the text or not. I'm not sure how to tell the difference 
between a gif that is an illustration and a gif file that is a fancy 
version of the title other than eyeballing it.

Charles provided some excellent success criteria. I'd rather work on 
rounding his out than start from scratch.

                                                         Anne


At 02:11 PM 7/30/01 +1000, Jason White wrote:
>Checkpoint 3.4 currently reads:
>
>"Use multimedia to illustrate concepts."
>
>The corresponding checkpoint in WCAG 1.0 (checkpoint 14.2) read as
>follows:
>
>"Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they
>      will facilitate comprehension of the page."
>
>In order to move this discussion forward, please indicate:
>
>a. Whether you are satisfied with either of the above formulations.
>
>b. If not, please provide a proposal that includes the following
>information:
>
>1. Your preferred alternative wording for checkpoint 3.4.
>
>2. Your rationale (why you think your proposal is better, whom it
>    would benefit, and why you think it would benefit them).
>
>3. Success criteria: what would a web content developer need to
>    accomplish in order to meet the checkpoint.
>
>Unless those who are interested in this issue start providing concrete
>proposals of this kind, I suspect the discussion will continue to
>reiterate the disagreements and give rise to the confusions which have
>characterised it up to this point.

Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 07:05:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:11 GMT