Anne, > I have absolutely no objections to anything in the newest > draft. I will try to read it through tomorrow and give you some help on > at least one of the places you asked for help, and, if no one tells you > first, there are a few typo/grammar errors that I spotted reading through it. great! Now, let's see how comfortable other people are with this draft, particularly checkpoint 3.4. > Wendy, Joel Sanda asks about illustrating the illustration > content. Can you tell him where to see what I did last time we were asked > to do that? We need to stabilize the text before we begin to build the > illustrations. Is your illustrator joining us? I haven't published what you sent to me yet. I will do that, my focus has been on this draft. I've also been waiting to get this out before contacting Meg again. I've just sent her a note and we'll see if she's still available. If not, other people have sent me names of people I can contact. > I look forward to this draft passing the consensus so we don't > have to hang a label over this one "under construction" ... with the > little earthmover icon!.... <grin/> Yes, it would be great if we could get the go ahead to move forward with this draft. But, I expect that I have overlooked or oversimplified something and that we'll have a few things to tweak before we move forward. --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 18:10:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:11 GMT