W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
cc: "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109280911270.13155-100000@tux.w3.org>

Jut for completeness of the record I agree with the consensus.

Charles

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:


  In the call today we created the following consensus points around big
  issues 6, 9, 10, and 12

[snipped]

Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 09:12:07 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Ley: "Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED"
Previous message: Charles McCathieNevile: "Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED"
In reply to: Gregg Vanderheiden: "NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:14 GMT