W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Cognition Simulation

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:45:42 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010827090429.02279d68@localhost>
To: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I understand where you are trying to get to, but this also gives an example 
of how important text is.

If I wouldn't know the WCAG background and the possible interpretations 
given to me in the list following the image, the image could mean several 
things to me. For instance, it could be: use international symbols for 
bathrooms to not confuse tourists. Or remember to keep women and men 
separate.  Or the guy things: "Which way should I go?" and then finds the 
answer: "Bodybuilders go to the left". And what if I come from culture that 
writes from right to left. Am I going to read the image that way too. So 
there are plenty of interpretations, and without the text or background 
knowledge it is quite impossible to know which ones to select.

Even if we take a cartoon, which is extreme as it has quite a lot of 
images, but it also text bubbles. If the text is written in a language that 
I don't know at all I can usually guess something based on the images, but 
cannot be exactly sure of what is happening. If I know the language a 
little, I can guess better. But the images alone seldom give me the whole 
understanding, unless they are standardized and I have learned the meaning.

Although I don't agree on your test setting I still think that images are 
important, for instance, in supporting the understanding of a text, 
motivating e.g. getting readers interested, and highlighting the most 
important things in the text.

Marja

At 04:47 PM 8/24/2001 -0400, Anne Pemberton wrote:
>Folks,
>
>         The first rough and unpolished version of a Cognition Simulation 
> is now available at: http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Guidelines/Cognition.html
>
>         Of course, y'all will recognize Chaals' illustration in it .... 
> interesting .... it's isn't possible to right click on a *.png image and 
> download it. I had to link it to Chaals' site ...
>
>         Come to think of it, I should link the sound file to it as 
> further illustration to help make the point.
>
>         Anyone else have suggestions, comments, etc? I'm most curious if 
> some of you think it does or doesn't do what it's intended to do - 
> simulate what it's like to be faced with an incomprehensible page.
>
>                                         Anne
>
>Anne Pemberton
>apembert@erols.com
>
>http://www.erols.com/stevepem
>http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 09:56:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:12 GMT