W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>
July to September 2001
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2001 by author
1161 messages
:
Starting
Sunday, 1 July 2001 23:31:00 GMT,
Ending
Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:30:46 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Aaron Swartz
Re: f2f session is over (8:50pm boston time/5:50pm local time [US Pacific])
(Tuesday, 11 September)
aastik
"Request to Join"
(Monday, 9 July)
Adam Victor Reed
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Monday, 23 July)
Al Gilman
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [violates: who does what]
(Tuesday, 25 September)
RE: [webwatch] Appropriate Alt Text
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
(Monday, 24 September)
Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: K-State example
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: Content vs User Agent question
(Wednesday, 19 September)
[script] K-State example
(Tuesday, 18 September)
who does what Re: The Alt/Object Problem [...]
(Tuesday, 18 September)
media mix and universal connectedness
(Saturday, 15 September)
Re: sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
(Saturday, 15 September)
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
(Saturday, 15 September)
Re: Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
(Friday, 14 September)
Re: Consensus on Elephants
(Thursday, 13 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: Consensus on Elephants
(Tuesday, 11 September)
Re: Fwd: Re: switch users
(Tuesday, 11 September)
Re: the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof)
(Tuesday, 11 September)
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Sunday, 9 September)
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Saturday, 8 September)
dyslexia: sources
(Saturday, 8 September)
two birds with one stone, focus, and organization
(Friday, 7 September)
Re: semantics in style
(Monday, 27 August)
RE: Data models?
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Data models?
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: AccessKeys and what to use
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Issue #10, disability specific information and server side stuff
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Agenda
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
(Wednesday, 22 August)
3.3, what now, what next?
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Modularization proposals
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
(Tuesday, 21 August)
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: alt title and links
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Action item: "default"
(Saturday, 18 August)
Re: Simplest and clearest...
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Possible deletion
(Friday, 17 August)
techniques, and a separate checkpoint, for word use
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
(Saturday, 11 August)
class use (notional vs. blindless grouping)
(Saturday, 11 August)
Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: PDF Techniques and Adobe products
(Friday, 27 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
style reflects affinity grouping beyond what's in an element type
(Saturday, 21 July)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Thursday, 19 July)
Alan J. Flavell
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: 20 Sept 2001 minutes
(Saturday, 22 September)
Re: alt title and links
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: alt title and links
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: alt title and links
(Sunday, 19 August)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
Andi Snow-Weaver
Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft
(Friday, 7 September)
Re: Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware
(Thursday, 6 September)
Regrets for today's call
(Thursday, 16 August)
Anne Pemberton
Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: Tone
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Tone
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Wednesday, 26 September)
RE: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: recommended reading
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: how/what
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: BIG ISSUES
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: how/what
(Thursday, 20 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Monday, 17 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Monday, 17 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Sunday, 16 September)
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
(Saturday, 15 September)
Re: Consensus on Elephants
(Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: Fwd: Re: switch users
(Tuesday, 11 September)
Fwd: Re: switch users
(Monday, 10 September)
Web user with dementia
(Wednesday, 5 September)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 4 September)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 4 September)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
Re: Bandwidth as a constraint
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: Executive Summary
(Tuesday, 28 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: The Web in the news
(Sunday, 26 August)
Re: Issue #10
(Sunday, 26 August)
RE: Are the guidelines upside down?
(Saturday, 25 August)
Re: Are the guidelines upside down?
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
Re: Saturday AM lyric
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Cognition Simulation
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Cognition Simulation
(Saturday, 25 August)
Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 24 August)
Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Issue #10
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: 3.3, what now, what next?
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Open issue #50
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: In defense of flame wars
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Tuesday, 21 August)
Re: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: Can't We All Just Get Along?
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Guideline 1 examples
(Saturday, 18 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Saturday, 18 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Saturday, 18 August)
Re: Action item: "default"
(Saturday, 18 August)
Re: Action item: "default"
(Saturday, 18 August)
Re: Action item: "default"
(Saturday, 18 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Saturday, 18 August)
Re: A brief examination of purpose.
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Simplest and clearest...
(Friday, 17 August)
Fwd: web access - ADA Laws
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: Illustrating example (was Re: New draft - 14 August 2001)
(Wednesday, 15 August)
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
(Wednesday, 15 August)
Re: forwarded message from Joe Clark
(Saturday, 11 August)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities"
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 9 August)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 9 August)
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: Plug for the insightful blind folks
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: Missing 3.4 thread stuff
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Monday, 6 August)
Plug for the insightful blind folks
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Saturday, 4 August)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Friday, 3 August)
Re: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Friday, 3 August)
Re: New checkpoint: identifying language
(Friday, 3 August)
Re: Illustrations for content
(Friday, 3 August)
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu
(Friday, 3 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Document structure
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Philosophy of WCAG (thanks Matt)
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Philosophy of WCAG (thanks Matt)
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: More on 3.4
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: the Ruler - Rule question
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: "Fixed" Print Versions (was: wichita state's usability resources)
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: wichita state's usability resources (Re: Aside on Fonts)
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
Aside on Fonts: was: RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
Re: NEW DRAFT NEW DRAFT NEW DRAFT
(Wednesday, 25 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Tuesday, 24 July)
RE: photos and participants
(Friday, 20 July)
RE: photos and participants
(Thursday, 19 July)
RE: an action item :)
(Sunday, 15 July)
RE: an action item :)
(Sunday, 15 July)
RE: an action item :)
(Sunday, 15 July)
RE: Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Thursday, 12 July)
RE: Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Thursday, 12 July)
Re: Sufficiency/checkpoint satisfaction criteria (repost of last week's draft)
(Monday, 9 July)
William Retiring
(Wednesday, 4 July)
Bjoern Hoehrmann
[Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20
(Friday, 28 September)
by way of Wendy A Chisholm
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Friday, 24 August)
Request to Join
(Monday, 30 July)
Charles F. Munat
RE: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
RE: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
RE: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
RE: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
RE: 20 Sept 2001 minutes
(Thursday, 20 September)
RE: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
(Sunday, 9 September)
RE: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Sunday, 9 September)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 28 August)
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
The Web in the news
(Sunday, 26 August)
RE: Are the guidelines upside down?
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
Are the guidelines upside down?
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Friday, 24 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Friday, 24 August)
RE: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 24 August)
RE: Data models?
(Friday, 24 August)
Data models?
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Friday, 24 August)
Checkpoint views
(Thursday, 23 August)
RE: In defense of flame wars
(Thursday, 23 August)
Issue #10
(Thursday, 23 August)
RE: Agenda
(Wednesday, 22 August)
In defense of flame wars
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Modularization proposals
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: Modularization
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
(Monday, 20 August)
Multiple guidelines views (views)
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: alt title and links
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Can't We All Just Get Along?
(Monday, 20 August)
A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: alt title and links
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Guideline 1 examples
(Monday, 20 August)
Functional equivalents vs. descriptions
(Monday, 20 August)
Guideline 1 examples
(Saturday, 18 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Saturday, 18 August)
RE: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
(Friday, 17 August)
A brief examination of purpose.
(Friday, 17 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Friday, 17 August)
Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
(Friday, 17 August)
Attractiveness and v.2
(Thursday, 16 August)
Advocacy in WCAG 2.0
(Thursday, 16 August)
RE: New draft - 14 August 2001
(Wednesday, 15 August)
Greetings
(Friday, 10 August)
Request to Join
(Thursday, 9 August)
Request to Join
(Thursday, 9 August)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12
(Friday, 28 September)
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Friday, 28 September)
Re: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Agenda
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
(Sunday, 23 September)
Re: Agenda
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Monday, 17 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Sunday, 16 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Thursday, 13 September)
Re: Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon
(Tuesday, 11 September)
irc log for monday morning
(Monday, 10 September)
Re: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
(Sunday, 9 September)
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Sunday, 9 September)
conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
(Saturday, 8 September)
no conformance requirements Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
(Saturday, 8 September)
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Friday, 7 September)
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Friday, 7 September)
Re: Bandwidth as a constraint
(Friday, 31 August)
Bandwidth as a constraint
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Thursday, 30 August)
Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
Re: Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Wednesday, 29 August)
Re: eating our own dog food
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: AccessKeys and what to use
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
WCAG 2 issue #1
(Thursday, 23 August)
RE: Open issue #55
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Eating one's own dog food
(Thursday, 23 August)
RE: Agenda
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Open issue #54
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Open issue #56
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Simplest and clearest...
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Guideline 1 examples
(Sunday, 19 August)
RE: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
(Monday, 13 August)
RE: add a sentence?
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: add a sentence?
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: Rewrites
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: Agenda
(Thursday, 9 August)
RE: 1.4 and ALT text
(Thursday, 9 August)
Re: Agenda
(Thursday, 9 August)
Re: RE 1.2-.13
(Thursday, 9 August)
Re: 1.4 and ALT text
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd)
(Monday, 6 August)
Missing 3.4 thread stuff
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
(Sunday, 5 August)
Re: Criterion
(Sunday, 5 August)
Re: Criterion
(Sunday, 5 August)
Re: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Saturday, 4 August)
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu
(Friday, 3 August)
RE: More on 3.4
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Thursday, 2 August)
3.4 illustration page RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: Combining 1.1 and 3.4
(Thursday, 2 August)
definition Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: feedback on "some things to play with"
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Multimedia
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Monday, 30 July)
Philosophy Re: More on 3.4
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: International Accessibility
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: NEW DRAFT NEW DRAFT NEW DRAFT
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Sounds and checkpoint 11.1
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: PDF Techniques and Adobe products
(Saturday, 28 July)
Philosophy of WCAG Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Tuesday, 24 July)
Re: [CSS-TECHS]
(Thursday, 19 July)
Re: Agenda
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Re: Who would be able to attend a F2F in Melbourne, Australia - 12-15 November 2001?
(Tuesday, 17 July)
Re: an action item :)
(Monday, 16 July)
RE: Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Sunday, 15 July)
Re: Agenda
(Wednesday, 11 July)
Re: DTD for techniques documents
(Thursday, 5 July)
Re: "Auditory" descriptions
(Thursday, 5 July)
Re: DTD for techniques documents
(Thursday, 5 July)
Re: DTD for techniques documents
(Thursday, 5 July)
Re: DTD for techniques documents
(Thursday, 5 July)
Re: "Auditory" descriptions
(Thursday, 5 July)
Guideline 10.5 and Table Cells (fwd)
(Tuesday, 3 July)
Re: Semantic pragmatic
(Monday, 2 July)
Chiarito-Mazzarella,Jay
Accessibility Testing Lab Software/Hardware?
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Chris Ridpath
Re: DTD for techniques documents
(Wednesday, 4 July)
Re: photos of the meeting
(Tuesday, 3 July)
Christopher Atkinson
Re: Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
(Friday, 14 September)
ckrupitzer
request to join
(Monday, 9 July)
cyns@opendesign.com
regrets for today's call
(Thursday, 6 September)
RE: Agenda - regrets
(Thursday, 30 August)
RE: Open issue #55
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Agenda
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
(Monday, 20 August)
Action item: "default"
(Saturday, 18 August)
last minute regrets
(Thursday, 9 August)
RE: Java scripts
(Tuesday, 31 July)
regrets for thursday's call
(Monday, 23 July)
RE: regrets
(Thursday, 19 July)
RE: an action item :)
(Friday, 13 July)
regrets for today's call
(Thursday, 12 July)
Dana Louise Simberkoff
Web site Accessibility Verification software for Microsoft FrontPage
(Monday, 24 September)
Daniel Dardailler
Call for Review of the XML Accessibility Guidelines
(Wednesday, 29 August)
Daniel Newman
Alt keys verses accesskey
(Tuesday, 14 August)
Request to Join
(Monday, 9 July)
David Poehlman
review of:Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 W3C Working Draft 24 August 2001
(Tuesday, 28 August)
suggested checkpoint title revision:
(Tuesday, 28 August)
question about 2.0 formats:
(Tuesday, 28 August)
David Sloan
WCAG Usability Testing - update and call for comments
(Tuesday, 14 August)
Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Re: Rewrites
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: checkpoint 3.4 again.
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: an action item :)
(Monday, 16 July)
Re: an action item :)
(Monday, 16 July)
Re: an action item :)
(Monday, 16 July)
Re: an action item :)
(Monday, 16 July)
Re: an action item :)
(Friday, 13 July)
geoff freed
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Friday, 24 August)
Graham Oliver
WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General
(Wednesday, 5 September)
WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Design Principles and the definition of Content
(Wednesday, 5 September)
WCAG 2.0 Feedback - Perceived lack of clarity about target audience for Guidelines Document
(Tuesday, 28 August)
What is the target audience for the guidelines? <eom>
(Thursday, 23 August)
Gregg Vanderheiden
Suggestion for List Posting
(Monday, 1 October)
RE: suggestion for WCAG checklist
(Saturday, 29 September)
BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Friday, 28 September)
NEW CONSENSUS CANDIDATES FOR BIG ISSUES 6,9,10,12
(Friday, 28 September)
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Sunday, 23 September)
CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
(Thursday, 20 September)
BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE)
(Thursday, 20 September)
OOPs missed one
(Wednesday, 19 September)
STATEMENTS WHERE CONSENSUS WAS NOT REACHED.
(Wednesday, 19 September)
CONSENSUS
(Wednesday, 19 September)
BIG ISSUES
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Issue Elephants, consensus and discussion
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Connundrum and a Proposal to Address It
(Friday, 13 July)
Consensus on Elephants
(Tuesday, 11 September)
On Procedure
(Monday, 10 September)
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Executive Summary
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
RE: Multiple guidelines views (views)
(Thursday, 23 August)
Research
(Thursday, 23 August)
RE: Guideline 1 examples
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: Guideline 1 examples
(Monday, 20 August)
Splitting guidelines
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Possible deletion
(Sunday, 19 August)
RE: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
(Sunday, 19 August)
RE: Can't We All Just Get Along?
(Sunday, 19 August)
Possible deletion
(Thursday, 16 August)
4.3 - descrambled
(Monday, 13 August)
RE: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
(Monday, 13 August)
RE: add a sentence?
(Sunday, 12 August)
Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
(Sunday, 12 August)
add a sentence?
(Sunday, 12 August)
RE: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Saturday, 11 August)
WCAG 2.0 Criteria Review For checkpoints up to 2.7
(Thursday, 9 August)
RE: 1.4 and ALT text
(Tuesday, 7 August)
RE 1.2-.13
(Thursday, 9 August)
F2F logistics
(Monday, 6 August)
1.4 and ALT text
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: Criterion
(Sunday, 5 August)
RE: Criterion
(Sunday, 5 August)
Criterion
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: Combing checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: New checkpoint: identifying language
(Friday, 3 August)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
the Ruler - Rule question
(Sunday, 29 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Wednesday, 25 July)
RE: Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Thursday, 12 July)
Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Thursday, 12 July)
Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Wednesday, 11 July)
RE: Proposal: sufficiency criteria for WCAG 2.0
(Thursday, 5 July)
gregory j. rosmaita
GJR's #wai IRC log (11 September 01 / 11:57:22 to 21:39:37)
(Wednesday, 12 September)
the emperor's clothes (or lack thereof)
(Monday, 10 September)
f2f regrets
(Monday, 10 September)
RE: Re: Alt keys verses accesskey
(Tuesday, 28 August)
ACCESSKEY-an actual strength in a perceived weakness
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: alt title and links
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: AccessKeys and what to use [resend with new attachment]
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: AccessKeys and what to use
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: [proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5
(Friday, 24 August)
[proposal] additional success criterion for WCAG2 CP 1.5
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Alt keys verses accesskey
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: Alt keys verses accesskey
(Thursday, 23 August)
demographic considerations (was Re: Including content modes in 4.1)
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 3.3 clear and simple Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: More on 3.4
(Thursday, 2 August)
slideshow sites/interfaces [was RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)]
(Thursday, 2 August)
feedback on "some things to play with"
(Wednesday, 1 August)
dissenting opinion (was Re: RE: checkpoint 3.4 again)
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Sounds and checkpoint 11.1
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: "Fixed" Print Versions (was: wichita state's usability resources)
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: wichita state's usability resources (Re: Aside on Fonts)
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: wichita state's usability resources (Re: Aside on Fonts)
(Saturday, 28 July)
wichita state's usability resources (Re: Aside on Fonts)
(Friday, 27 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Tuesday, 24 July)
Re: fun: photos and participants
(Monday, 23 July)
Re: minutes from 20 june 2001 GL f2f
(Thursday, 19 July)
multimedia breakout notes (20 june 2001/GL f2f)
(Thursday, 19 July)
raw minutes: final afternoon session of GL f2f, 21 june 2001
(Thursday, 19 July)
minutes from 20 june 2001 GL f2f
(Thursday, 19 July)
UAAG's content-type, output modality, & selection labels
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Ian B. Jacobs
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 12 September)
Iribar Jon
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Monday, 24 September)
Jason White
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Friday, 28 September)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Same URI? [was: Re: BIG ISSUES]
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: CONSENSUS REVISED 9-20-01
(Friday, 21 September)
Re: BIG ISSUES REVISED 9-20-01 (SEE BOTTOM OF NOTE)
(Friday, 21 September)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: Fwd: minutes, some before lunch, some this afternoon
(Tuesday, 11 September)
Re: On Procedure
(Monday, 10 September)
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Sunday, 9 September)
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Sunday, 9 September)
Re: conformance to functionality classes Re: Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
(Sunday, 9 September)
Proposals: Priority and Conformance schemes
(Friday, 7 September)
Structure of deliverables: guidelines and techniques documents
(Friday, 7 September)
Agenda
(Thursday, 6 September)
RE: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 4 September)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 29 August)
RE: Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: Issue #10
(Sunday, 26 August)
Re: Issue #10
(Thursday, 23 August)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Modularization proposals
(Tuesday, 21 August)
Re: Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Agenda
(Tuesday, 14 August)
forwarded message from Joe Clark
(Saturday, 11 August)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 8 August)
Agenda
(Thursday, 9 August)
Re: Criterion
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: Criterion
(Sunday, 5 August)
Re: Illustrations for content
(Friday, 3 August)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Issues arising from 31 July draft
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: International Accessibility
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Monday, 30 July)
Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: References and contact (was: RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd))
(Thursday, 26 July)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 25 July)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Re: Who would be able to attend a F2F in Melbourne, Australia - 12-15 November 2001?
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Re: Comments on SUFFICIENCY for tomorrows COnf Call
(Thursday, 12 July)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 11 July)
Sufficiency/checkpoint satisfaction criteria (repost of last week's draft)
(Tuesday, 10 July)
Additional agenda item
(Wednesday, 4 July)
Agenda
(Wednesday, 4 July)
Proposal: sufficiency criteria for WCAG 2.0
(Tuesday, 3 July)
Jim Ley
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: [Scripts-TECHS] Comments on Script Techniques for WCAG20
(Friday, 28 September)
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Friday, 28 September)
Script checker and a techniques document to support it.
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Tool to aid with script conformance in pages.
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Sunday, 23 September)
Re: 20 Sept 2001 minutes
(Thursday, 20 September)
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Wednesday, 19 September)
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Wednesday, 19 September)
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: Issues on WCAG 2.0 August 24th draft
(Friday, 7 September)
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Friday, 7 September)
Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 3.)
(Thursday, 6 September)
Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.)
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Jo Miller
Minutes for 27 September 2001 telecon
(Thursday, 27 September)
Agenda - regrets
(Thursday, 30 August)
JAWS, alt, and title (was Re: alt title and links)
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Rewrite of Introduction: Purpose
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
(Thursday, 16 August)
le mot juste [was Wording issues]
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: New draft - 14 August 2001
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: 9 August 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
(Friday, 10 August)
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
(Thursday, 2 August)
probable regrets
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
RE: [CSS-TECHS]
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Re: [CSS-TECHS]
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Re: New CSS Techniques draft
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Request to join
(Friday, 13 July)
Joe Clark
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
AccessiBlog updated
(Saturday, 22 September)
Checkpoint 1.2 clarifications
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Font Sizes - units of measure
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Caption synchronization tolerance
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Caption synchronization tolerance
(Thursday, 23 August)
Infamous article now online
(Tuesday, 21 August)
Modularization
(Monday, 20 August)
Title testing
(Monday, 20 August)
Tech Players Question IAB's Rich Media Guidelines
(Saturday, 18 August)
"Real-time commentary"
(Thursday, 16 August)
Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Re: Wording issues
(Thursday, 16 August)
Wording issues
(Wednesday, 15 August)
Further infamy for Joe Clark
(Tuesday, 14 August)
Multimode expression
(Sunday, 12 August)
Rewrites
(Saturday, 11 August)
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illu
(Friday, 3 August)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Monday, 30 July)
List etiquette
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Saturday, 28 July)
Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Saturday, 28 July)
Re: Who would be able to attend a F2F in Melbourne
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Re: "Auditory" descriptions
(Thursday, 5 July)
"Auditory" descriptions
(Thursday, 5 July)
Joel Sanda
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Saturday, 4 August)
Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Saturday, 4 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: More on 3.4
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Thursday, 2 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Tuesday, 31 July)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Tuesday, 31 July)
RE: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Thursday, 26 July)
RE: [CSS-TECHS] goals and audience of this document
(Thursday, 19 July)
RE: [CSS-TECHS]
(Wednesday, 18 July)
RE: [CSS-TECHS]
(Wednesday, 18 July)
RE: !important
(Tuesday, 17 July)
RE: !important
(Tuesday, 17 July)
Jon Ferraiolo
Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
(Thursday, 2 August)
Jon Gunderson
Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: !important
(Tuesday, 17 July)
Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
(Sunday, 30 September)
keep the bandwidth low, but illustrate was: Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Sunday, 30 September)
Does one design for interactivity or content? [Scripts-TECHS]
(Saturday, 29 September)
Does anyone know of any other script wizards?
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Tone
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Tone
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Tone
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Tone
(Thursday, 27 September)
Re: Tone
(Wednesday, 26 September)
Re: Browser and Technology Support [Was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Tone
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Sunday, 23 September)
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: BIG ISSUES
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: media mix and universal connectedness
(Sunday, 16 September)
Are we having fun, yet?
(Saturday, 15 September)
sigint-humint was Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
(Saturday, 15 September)
Re: definition of accessible: text is convenient
(Saturday, 15 September)
definition of accessible: text is convenient
(Saturday, 15 September)
Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Friday, 14 September)
UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: Consensus on Elephants
(Tuesday, 11 September)
Re: On Procedure
(Monday, 10 September)
Re: Structure of deliverables: are we too PC for our own good?
(Sunday, 9 September)
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Thursday, 6 September)
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
(Thursday, 6 September)
Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 1.)
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Re: WCAG 2.0 Feedback - General
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 4 September)
Akamai creates a number of streaming applications.....
(Sunday, 2 September)
akamai
(Saturday, 1 September)
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
dead-reckoning was Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Friday, 31 August)
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Wednesday, 29 August)
understanding vs implementing Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Re: Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 28 August)
a library of visual aids? Re: Cognition Simulation
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Mail order catalogues was Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: greek was Cognition Simulation
(Monday, 27 August)
Re: Cognition Simulation
(Sunday, 26 August)
Re: Research
(Thursday, 23 August)
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: 3.3, what now, what next?
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: WCAG In Haiku; From William's Terse Version; Hope These Are Helpful
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Can't We All Just Get Along?
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Re: Modularization proposals
(Tuesday, 21 August)
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
(Monday, 20 August)
the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines.
(Monday, 20 August)
alt title and links
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: guideline 7.1 about screen flickering (fwd)
(Friday, 27 July)
Re: photos and participants
(Saturday, 21 July)
Re: photos and participants
(Friday, 20 July)
Judy Brewer
Re: Tone
(Tuesday, 25 September)
Stop this thread [was: Re: AccessiBlog updated]
(Monday, 24 September)
Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists
(Thursday, 9 August)
Katie Haritos-Shea
Re: media mix and universal connectedness, plus SENSES and CHOICES
(Tuesday, 18 September)
PDF Techniques for WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 Dated Sept 13th, 2001
(Thursday, 6 September)
Regrets
(Thursday, 9 August)
Regrets for Tomorrow...................
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: the Ruler - Rule question
(Sunday, 29 July)
Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Sunday, 29 July)
HTML minutes 26-07-2001 Teleconference (FINALLY)
(Saturday, 28 July)
FW: Winners of ICAES 2001 International Access Engineering Awards Announced & WAVE
(Friday, 27 July)
William's Semantic Web Primer
(Wednesday, 18 July)
Regrets and Action Item
(Wednesday, 18 July)
F2F meeting in Melbourne
(Tuesday, 17 July)
HTML Minutes for Today July 12, 2001
(Friday, 13 July)
HTML Minutes for July 5, 2001
(Friday, 6 July)
Kelly Ford
WCAG 2.0 Comment: What Tells Me To label Input Controls
(Tuesday, 28 August)
Kynn Bartlett
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Monday, 1 October)
Re: User and user needs conflict- BIG ISSUES REMAINING TO BE DISCUSSED
(Monday, 1 October)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
RE: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: AccessiBlog updated
(Monday, 24 September)
Re: Bandwidth as a constraint
(Friday, 31 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
RE: Disability Type Analysis of WCAG 1.0
(Saturday, 25 August)
Against WCAG 1.0 style priorities->conformance
(Friday, 24 August)
Re: In defense of flame wars
(Wednesday, 22 August)
Higher Profile for Non-Blind Disabled Users
(Wednesday, 22 August)
RE: Guideline 1 examples
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
(Tuesday, 21 August)
RE: Modularization
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: Multiple guidelines views (views)
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Walking A Mile In Someone Else's Shoes
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Guideline 1 examples
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: alt title and links
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Guideline 1 examples
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: Functional equivalents vs. descriptions
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: A PROPOSAL TO SPLIT THE WCAG IN THREE. Please read this. I'm serious.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: Why we will never find a good version of 3.3 (and what's wrong with WCAG 2.0)
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: the 4 colour theorem, and an alternative to the current list of guidelines.
(Monday, 20 August)
Re: Title testing
(Monday, 20 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Sunday, 19 August)
RE: Simplest and clearest...
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Simplest and clearest...
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Guideline 1 examples
(Sunday, 19 August)
Can't We All Just Get Along?
(Sunday, 19 August)
Re: Action item: "default"
(Saturday, 18 August)
Re: Simplest and clearest...
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Possible deletion
(Friday, 17 August)
Simplest and clearest...
(Friday, 17 August)
Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: Multimode expression
(Sunday, 12 August)
Re: forwarded message from Joe Clark
(Saturday, 11 August)
Re: Rewrites
(Saturday, 11 August)
Paper "Designing for users with cognitive disabilities"
(Tuesday, 7 August)
Re: linking? RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria (fwd)
(Monday, 6 August)
Re: Plug for the insightful blind folks
(Monday, 6 August)
RE: Minutes from 02 August 2001 telecon
(Sunday, 5 August)
RE: Proposal for 3.4 Success Criteria
(Sunday, 5 August)
Re: Criterion
(Sunday, 5 August)
RE: New checkpoint: identifying language
(Friday, 3 August)
Re: Illustrations for content
(Friday, 3 August)
Illustrations for content
(Thursday, 2 August)
Re: examples of a variety of sites that include illustrations of concepts (i.e., examples of 3.4)
(Thursday, 2 August)
More Philosophy Stuff
(Wednesday, 1 August)
RE: NEW DRAFT - 31 July 2001
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Including content modes in 4.1
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Gutenberg at HWG
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Wednesday, 1 August)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Philosophy of WCAG (thanks Matt)
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Document structure
(Tuesday, 31 July)
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Proposal: checkpoint 3.4
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Monday, 30 July)
RE: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Philosophy of WCAG (thanks Matt)
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Monday, 30 July)
RE: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
Philosophy of WCAG (thanks Matt)
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Format for addressing grade-level content........
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: the Ruler - Rule question
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: List etiquette
(Monday, 30 July)
Re: Proposal deriving from checkpoint 2.1
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Sounds and checkpoint 11.1
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Checkpoint 3.4 again
(Sunday, 29 July)
Re: Sounds and checkpoint 11.1