W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:02:25 -0400
Message-Id: <a0510030bb78b35567672@[]>
To: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>, <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 5:13 PM -0400 2001/7/29, Anne Pemberton wrote:
>	I'd suggest that text which is content is the text that needs 
>equivalents. Text that is a link already has an equivalent at the 
>end of the click ... text that is in a database or table may or may 
>not need an equivalent, depending on whether it's content, or just 
>an index ..... Text is a glossary, dictionary, or encyclopedia 
>should have at least one equivalent ...

Maybe we don't want to say "equivalent", maybe we want to say "parallels"?

Does that semantic quibble help turn the issue around for anyone?


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
Tel +1 949-567-7006
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 12:31:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:38 UTC