Re: Checkpoint views

At 04:00 PM 8/23/01 -0700, Charles F. Munat wrote:
>Maybe users could make up their own.

Hence the mantra "author proposes, user disposes".

If the user of the GL isn't as empowered by their presentation as the 
output we call upon authors to provide, I'll need another entry in the sig 
line below! As in "each checkpoint that flaunts its own requirements..."

Perhaps CP 3.4 could be "prepare textual manifestations with irreducibly 
transparentized obfuscation methodologies and maximize their lack of 
extraneous containments by means of minimilizations"?

--
Love.
EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 19:18:19 UTC