W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: WCAG 1.0 CP 6.1 Considered Harmful [was: Re: who does what]

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:11:20 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010925200800.00ab3830@pop.erols.com>
To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
William,

         <grin> well said!!!! the web has the capacity to change minute by 
minute but we change year by year???

         And the latest and greatest needs to have an exclusive URL so it 
can be easily remembered and cited ...

                                                 Anne

At 10:46 AM 9/25/01 -0700, William Loughborough wrote:
There is no tradition/prospect of providing semantics. As a species we have 
in the past, continue in the present, and can be expected in the future to 
endlessly confuse map with territory and failing to notice Empirical Nudity.

>We've sort of isolated aspects of the problem: "no, not *there*, click 
>*here*" but solutions via pronouncement rather than myriad exemplification 
>are exercises in Pedantics rather than assistances with Semantics. Show 
>and Tell. Over and over. [Over and out]
>--
>Love.
>EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY

Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 21:30:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:14 GMT