ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013 by author

Abdelaziz Raji

Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)

Adrian Cole

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Saturday, 14 December)

Adrien de Croy

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Monday, 9 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Fwd: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
on the long-term viability of http/1.1 as a fall-back option (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)

Alan Shreve

Ambiguity when handling DATA frames on closed streams (Friday, 29 November)

Albert Lunde

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)

Alexandre Anzala-Yamajako

Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Saturday, 23 November)

Alexey Melnikov

Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Strawman for DoS considerations (Friday, 11 October)
Re: Frame Type 8 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)

Amos Jeffries

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations - missing Secure method (Tuesday, 17 December)
Question for the editors about draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25 (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
RE: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Things we know and can hopefully agree upon w.r.t. the state of the web today. (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP/2.0 protocol identifier string (#323) (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Thursday, 24 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Saturday, 19 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: Uppercase/lowercase header field names (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Strawman for DoS considerations (Saturday, 12 October)
Re: #255 eviction for substitution (Thursday, 10 October)
Re: Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade (Sunday, 6 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Thursday, 3 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)

Andrei Popov

RE: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 29 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Wednesday, 23 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 22 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 21 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Friday, 18 October)

Andrew Rockwell

RE: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Wednesday, 23 October)

Barry Leiba

Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14 (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [secdir] RFC2119 vs "ought" etc, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)

Benjamin Carlyle

Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)

bizzbyster@gmail.com

Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Sunday, 3 November)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: authenticated unencrypted (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: httpbis -24 drafts (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Monday, 11 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Monday, 4 November)
Re: additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: proxies and forwarding of credentials, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #504 does From: allow non addr-spec mailbox values? (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: Mobile headers (Wednesday, 16 October)

Brian Smith

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)

Bruce Perens

Sorry (Wednesday, 4 December)
perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Fwd: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)

Carsten Bormann

Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)

chenyl@arraynetworks.com.cn

Any HTTP/2.0 browser/server available for test (Friday, 27 December)

Chris Burdess

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Wednesday, 11 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Wednesday, 11 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Monday, 9 December)
HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Monday, 9 December)

Christian Huitema

RE: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Monday, 16 December)
RE: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Monday, 16 December)
RE: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
RE: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
RE: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
RE: Rough minutes (Monday, 11 November)

cowwoc

Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Cacheable status codes (Wednesday, 23 October)
Cacheable response codes (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Advice (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Cacheable status codes (Friday, 11 October)

Dan Winship

non-tls http2 client has to send settings twice? (Tuesday, 10 December)

Daniel Stenberg

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)

David Morris

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Monday, 25 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)

Eliot Lear

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Things we know and can hopefully agree upon w.r.t. the state of the web today. (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)

emile.stephan@orange.com

implementation of HTTP 2.0 Upgrade in node-http2 (Sunday, 3 November)
RE: New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt (Friday, 18 October)
RE: New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt (Thursday, 17 October)

Eric Rescorla

Re: TLS WG discussion of ALPN (Thursday, 7 November)

Erik Nygren

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)

Fred Akalin

Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Saturday, 26 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Uppercase/lowercase header field names (Wednesday, 16 October)

Frode Kileng

Re: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 (Thursday, 28 November)

Frédéric Kayser

Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation (Friday, 18 October)

Geoff Beier

Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Friday, 15 November)

Gili

Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)

Graham Klyne

Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Thursday, 7 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Thursday, 7 November)

Grahame Grieve

Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)

Hannes Tschofenig

Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)

Hans Spaak

Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Thursday, 7 November)
Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)

Henri Sivonen

Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Friday, 8 November)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Monday, 4 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 4 November)

Henry Story

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Monday, 18 November)

Hervé Ruellan

Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)

Howard Johnson

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)

IESG Secretary

HTTPBIS WG Interim Meeting, 22-24 January 2014 (Tuesday, 29 October)

Ilari Liusvaara

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Some entropy calculations with secret/huffman interaction (Wednesday, 27 November)
Some entropy calculations with secret/huffman interaction (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Monday, 11 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Monday, 11 November)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)

Iljitsch van Beijnum

Re: [IAB] Mandatory encryption as part of HTTP2 (Friday, 15 November)

Ilya Grigorik

Re: per stream (initial) flow window size (Thursday, 10 October)
Re: per stream (initial) flow window size (Thursday, 10 October)
per stream (initial) flow window size (Tuesday, 8 October)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Wednesday, 4 December)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-05.txt (Wednesday, 4 December)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-09.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25.txt (Sunday, 17 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08.txt (Monday, 11 November)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-07.txt (Monday, 21 October)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-04.txt (Monday, 21 October)

James Cloos

Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: 2817 for TLS (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09) (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)

James M Snell

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-02.txt (Monday, 25 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Tuesday, 19 November)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: on the long-term viability of http/1.1 as a fall-back option (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Tuesday, 12 November)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-ext-frames-01.txt (Monday, 11 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Sunday, 10 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Sunday, 10 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Friday, 8 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Friday, 8 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Thursday, 7 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 4 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)

Jari Arkko

Re: [Gen-art] [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: [Gen-art] spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: [Gen-art] #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25 (Thursday, 19 December)

Jason Duell

Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)

Jeff Pinner

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 21 December)
Re: Is more than 7bits EOS padding or full EOS sequence in huffman byte string subject to compression error? (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: Ambiguity when handling DATA frames on closed streams (Monday, 2 December)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)

John C Klensin

Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 28 October)
Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 28 October)

Joseph Lorenzo Hall

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)

Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)

Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-02.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)

Josh Howlett

Re: Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Thursday, 5 December)

Julian Reschke

#540 clarify ABNF layering (Saturday, 28 December)
#541, use of "word" ABNF production (Saturday, 21 December)
Re: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations - missing Secure method (Tuesday, 17 December)
Fwd: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Monday, 16 December)
Re: #528, Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf (Monday, 16 December)
#528, Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf (Friday, 13 December)
Re: #527, Question for the editors about draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25 (Friday, 13 December)
#527, Question for the editors about draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25 (Friday, 13 December)
Re: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Sunday, 8 December)
spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Friday, 6 December)
Fwd: [httpbis] #525: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Fwd: [httpbis] #524: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14 (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25 (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14 (Monday, 18 November)
#522, was: Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14 (Monday, 18 November)
Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Monday, 18 November)
#520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Monday, 18 November)
Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Monday, 18 November)
Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Monday, 18 November)
Re: on the long-term viability of http/1.1 as a fall-back option (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
httpbis -25 drafts, Re: httpbis -24 drafts (Sunday, 17 November)
httpbis -24 drafts (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Sunday, 10 November)
Re: #507 integer value parsing, Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Thursday, 7 November)
draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24, "4.3.4 PUT" (Thursday, 7 November)
#507 integer value parsing, Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Thursday, 7 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
relax SHOULD send Last-Modified?, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24 (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Monday, 4 November)
Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13 (Monday, 4 November)
Re: additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Friday, 1 November)
Re: additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
proxies and forwarding of credentials, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: Reuse of credentials per realm, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Reuse of credentials per realm, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
WWW-Authenticate parsing quirks, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
#516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: [secdir] RFC2119 vs "ought" etc, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
deprecation of HTTP header field line folding, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
RFC2119 vs "ought" etc, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #504 does From: allow non addr-spec mailbox values? (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #504 does From: allow non addr-spec mailbox values? (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Fwd: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: #504 does From: allow non addr-spec mailbox values? (Tuesday, 29 October)
connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
#506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
custom byte ranges, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 28 October)
Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Monday, 28 October)
#504 does From: allow non addr-spec mailbox values? (Monday, 28 October)
Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 28 October)
IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 28 October)
obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 28 October)
IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Sunday, 27 October)
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard (Sunday, 27 October)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)
#501, was: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Cacheable status codes (Friday, 11 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)

Kari Hurtta

6.6 PUSH_PROMISE (Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States) (Thursday, 19 December)
draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States (Saturday, 30 November)

Karl Dubost

Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)

Kulkarni, Saurabh

Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Friday, 18 October)
Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)

Larry Masinter

RE: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Monday, 4 November)

Manger, James H

RE: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Friday, 8 November)
RE: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Thursday, 7 November)

Mark Baker

Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Thursday, 17 October)

Mark Nottingham

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Zurich Agenda - adjustment? (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 13 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
FYI: Using ALPN protocol IDs in Web Perf specs (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Zurich Agenda - adjustment? (Thursday, 12 December)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 11 December)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-01.txt (Wednesday, 11 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Monday, 9 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25 (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: 2014 Meeting planning (Thursday, 5 December)
Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: 2014 Meeting planning (Thursday, 5 December)
Proxy User Stories (Thursday, 5 December)
2014 Meeting planning (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Third Implementation Draft [was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt] (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 (Thursday, 28 November)
Fwd: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
#1: Upgrade proposals [was: Call for Proposals re: #314] (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
#1: Upgrade Mechanism (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Monday, 18 November)
Re: That wonderful 1980-ies hippie vibe... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Monday, 18 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Zurich Interim duration (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Draft-08 and Third Implementation Draft Milestones (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Tuesday, 12 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Wednesday, 6 November)
Rough minutes (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: relax SHOULD send Last-Modified?, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24 (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Monday, 4 November)
Re: proxies and forwarding of credentials, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: Rough agenda for Vancouver (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Friday, 25 October)
Re: Cacheable response codes (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Cacheable status codes (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 22 October)
Heads up for January F2F (Tuesday, 22 October)
Preliminary minutes from the Seattle Interim (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Rough agenda for Vancouver (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Minutes from last week's interim meeting? (Saturday, 19 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Saturday, 19 October)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Saturday, 19 October)
Re: Mobile headers (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Mobile headers (Wednesday, 16 October)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-01.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 15 October)
Questions about ALPN (Monday, 14 October)
Re: per stream (initial) flow window size (Wednesday, 9 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
FYI: DRAFT agenda for Vancouver is out (Monday, 7 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Sunday, 6 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)

Mark Watson

Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)

Markus Lanthaler

RE: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)

Martin J. Dürst

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: 2014 Meeting planning (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Saturday, 26 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 15 October)

Martin Nilsson

Re: Mobile headers (Wednesday, 16 October)
Mobile headers (Friday, 11 October)

Martin Thomson

Re: 8.1.2 Examples (Re: 6.6 PUSH_PROMISE (Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States)) (Monday, 23 December)
Re: 6.6 PUSH_PROMISE (Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States) (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: 6.6 PUSH_PROMISE (Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States) (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: authenticated unencrypted (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: authenticated unencrypted (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations - missing Secure method (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Monday, 16 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Monday, 16 December)
Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Friday, 13 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: non-tls http2 client has to send settings twice? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/329 - Flow control window overflow (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: 2817 for TLS (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09) (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Thursday, 5 December)
2817 for TLS (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09) (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Wednesday, 4 December)
Default stream priority (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Ambiguity when handling DATA frames on closed streams (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Ambiguity when handling DATA frames on closed streams (Monday, 2 December)
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Some entropy calculations with secret/huffman interaction (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Monday, 25 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: #1: Upgrade proposals [was: Call for Proposals re: #314] (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
#305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: HTTP/2.0 protocol identifier string (#323) (Sunday, 17 November)
HTTP/2.0 protocol identifier string (#323) (Sunday, 17 November)
Cookie crumbling in -09 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Draft-08 and Third Implementation Draft Milestones (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08.txt (Monday, 11 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: question about :authority header field (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Sunday, 27 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Saturday, 26 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: question about :authority header field (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Does HTTP/2.0 client connection header include SETTINGS frame? (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Cookie crumbling (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: on/about a stream, frame ordering (Monday, 21 October)
Re: on/about a stream, frame ordering (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation (Friday, 18 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Uppercase/lowercase header field names (Wednesday, 16 October)
Uppercase/lowercase header field names (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 15 October)
Strawman for DoS considerations (Friday, 11 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)
Re: Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade (Monday, 7 October)
Re: last example on 8.1.1 is faulty? (Monday, 7 October)
Re: CONNECT and HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 7 October)
#255 eviction for substitution (Monday, 7 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 4 October)
Re: CONNECT and HTTP/2.0 (Thursday, 3 October)
Re: CONNECT and HTTP/2.0 (Thursday, 3 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)

Matthew Kerwin

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: authenticated unencrypted (Wednesday, 18 December)
authenticated unencrypted (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)

Matthew Lepinski

HPACK Security : Academic Paper (Tuesday, 5 November)

Michael Sweet

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Monday, 9 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 15 October)

Michael Welzl

Re: [tsvwg] The List (of application-layer desired features) (Friday, 11 October)

mike amundsen

Re: Things we know and can hopefully agree upon w.r.t. the state of the web today. (Monday, 18 November)

Mike Belshe

Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
Fwd: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: on the long-term viability of http/1.1 as a fall-back option (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)

Mike Bishop

RE: Any HTTP/2.0 browser/server available for test (Friday, 27 December)
RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt (Thursday, 5 December)
RE: I revised the pro/contra document (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
RE: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Saturday, 16 November)
RE: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Tuesday, 12 November)
RE: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Saturday, 9 November)
New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Friday, 8 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Monday, 4 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 29 October)
RE: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 28 October)
RE: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
RE: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
RE: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
RE: Does HTTP/2.0 client connection header include SETTINGS frame? (Monday, 21 October)
RE: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Friday, 18 October)
RE: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
RE: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
RE: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
RE: #255 eviction for substitution (Monday, 7 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)
Re: Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade (Monday, 7 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
RE: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)

Moriarty, Kathleen

RE: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25 (Thursday, 19 December)

Nicholas Hurley

Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)

Nico Williams

Re: Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression) (Friday, 13 December)
Re: [secdir] additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: [tsvwg] The List (of application-layer desired features) (Friday, 11 October)

Nicolas Mailhot

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 11 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Wednesday, 11 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Friday, 29 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Friday, 29 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Things we know and can hopefully agree upon w.r.t. the state of the web today. (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Tuesday, 12 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Sunday, 10 November)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt (Wednesday, 9 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)

Osama Mazahir

HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
RE: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 4 October)
multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 4 October)

Patrick McManus

Re: authenticated unencrypted (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP/2.0 protocol identifier string (#323) (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Draft-08 and Third Implementation Draft Milestones (Wednesday, 13 November)
TLS WG discussion of ALPN (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Monday, 4 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Friday, 18 October)
Re: per stream (initial) flow window size (Thursday, 10 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)

Paul Hoffman

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Saturday, 30 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Thursday, 21 November)
Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Wednesday, 20 November)
Minutes from last week's interim meeting? (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 14 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Thursday, 10 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)

Peter Lepeska

Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Friday, 13 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Three More Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Three More Proxy User Stories (Sunday, 8 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Sunday, 8 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Saturday, 9 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
HPACK performance summary (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
If anyone's in vancouver (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Sunday, 3 November)

Peter Saint-Andre

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)

Philippe Mougin

Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)

Phillip Hallam-Baker

Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)
MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)

Piotr Galecki

RE: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)

Poul-Henning Kamp

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Fwd: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: That wonderful 1980-ies hippie vibe... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
That wonderful 1980-ies hippie vibe... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation (Monday, 4 November)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)

Ray Polk

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24 (Monday, 4 November)

Rob Trace

RE: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)

Robert Collins

Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)

Roberto Peon

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 December)
Re: Is more than 7bits EOS padding or full EOS sequence in huffman byte string subject to compression error? (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: disabling header compression (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Monday, 9 December)
Re: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/329 - Flow control window overflow (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Some entropy calculations with secret/huffman interaction (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Things we know and can hopefully agree upon w.r.t. the state of the web today. (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: on the long-term viability of http/1.1 as a fall-back option (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Monday, 18 November)
Re: That wonderful 1980-ies hippie vibe... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: [IAB] Mandatory encryption as part of HTTP2 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt (Friday, 8 November)
Re: HPACK Security : Academic Paper (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Tuesday, 5 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Monday, 4 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Saturday, 26 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Saturday, 26 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Wednesday, 23 October)
HPACK examples. (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Monday, 21 October)
Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Saturday, 19 October)
RE: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation (Friday, 18 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03 (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Wednesday, 16 October)
All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Questions about ALPN (Monday, 14 October)
Re: Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade (Monday, 7 October)
Re: HPACK benchmark test for substitution indexing vs incremental indexing only (Monday, 7 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: CONNECT and HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)
Re: HTTP/2 extensions and proxies (Tuesday, 1 October)

Roland Zink

Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: #528, Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf (Saturday, 21 December)
Re: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 (Thursday, 19 December)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Wednesday, 13 November)
p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Tuesday, 12 November)

RUELLAN Herve

RE: #305 Header ordering (Tuesday, 26 November)
RE: #305 Header ordering (Friday, 22 November)
RE: Draft-08 and Third Implementation Draft Milestones (Thursday, 14 November)
RE: question about :authority header field (Tuesday, 29 October)
RE: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Friday, 18 October)
RE: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Friday, 18 October)
RE: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Friday, 18 October)
RE: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Thursday, 17 October)
RE: I ran across this while working on the spec. (Thursday, 17 October)
RE: Uppercase/lowercase header field names (Thursday, 17 October)
RE: #255 eviction for substitution (Wednesday, 9 October)
RE: HPACK benchmark test for substitution indexing vs incremental indexing only (Monday, 7 October)

Ryan Hamilton

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)

S Moonesamy

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13 (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review, etc. (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: custom byte ranges, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24 (Wednesday, 30 October)
APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08 (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24 (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 (Monday, 28 October)
APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24 (Monday, 28 October)

Salvatore Loreto

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Rough agenda for Vancouver (Monday, 21 October)
Re: New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt (Wednesday, 16 October)
New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt (Wednesday, 9 October)
Frame Type 8 (Saturday, 5 October)
last example on 8.1.1 is faulty? (Saturday, 5 October)
Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade (Saturday, 5 October)

Scharf, Michael (Michael)

Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)

Simon Yarde

Re: #528, Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf (Monday, 16 December)
Re: #528, Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf (Monday, 16 December)
Re: Trailer bug (Friday, 13 December)
Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf (Friday, 13 December)
Trailer bug (Friday, 13 December)

SM

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)

Stefan Eissing

Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Focusing our discussion on issues (Friday, 15 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 1 October)

Stephen Farrell

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Monday, 16 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Sunday, 8 December)
Explicit proxy options and defaults (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Saturday, 30 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Friday, 29 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
something I don't get about the current plan... (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)

Sufian Rhazi

Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)
HTTP response cacheability and query components (Thursday, 17 October)

Tao Effect

Announcing DNSNMC - fixes the HTTPS authentication problem using Namecoin (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?! (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)

Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa

Re: Is more than 7bits EOS padding or full EOS sequence in huffman byte string subject to compression error? (Wednesday, 18 December)
Is more than 7bits EOS padding or full EOS sequence in huffman byte string subject to compression error? (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: #305 Header ordering (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: question about :authority header field (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Sunday, 27 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Saturday, 26 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding (Friday, 25 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Wednesday, 23 October)
question about :authority header field (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Next pre-draft implementation in javascript. (Monday, 21 October)
Re: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Saturday, 19 October)
Re: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Saturday, 19 October)
Re: SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Friday, 18 October)
SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK (Friday, 18 October)
Re: First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document. (Thursday, 17 October)
Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: CONNECT and HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 5 October)

Ted Hardie

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Monday, 9 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) (Tuesday, 26 November)

The IESG

Tim Bray

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Saturday, 23 November)
I revised the pro/contra document (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Wednesday, 6 November)

Tobias Gondrom

Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option. (Friday, 15 November)

Vlad Avdeev

Http 2 (Sunday, 15 December)

Werner Baumann

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)

Willy Tarreau

Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Monday, 2 December)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: #1: Upgrade proposals [was: Call for Proposals re: #314] (Friday, 22 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Thursday, 21 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Fwd: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Monday, 18 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers") (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0 (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling in -09 (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Saturday, 16 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648 (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation) (Monday, 21 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: Does idempotence include the response codes? (Tuesday, 15 October)
Re: Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 15 October)

Yi, EungJun

Re: Does HTTP/2.0 client connection header include SETTINGS frame? (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: Does HTTP/2.0 client connection header include SETTINGS frame? (Tuesday, 22 October)
Does HTTP/2.0 client connection header include SETTINGS frame? (Sunday, 20 October)

Yoav Nir

Re: authenticated unencrypted (Wednesday, 18 December)
RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Monday, 16 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
RE: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Thursday, 12 December)
RE: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Wednesday, 11 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
RE: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: Three More Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Three More Proxy User Stories (Monday, 9 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Sunday, 8 December)
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Saturday, 7 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs (Friday, 6 December)
RE: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
RE: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Sunday, 1 December)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Yet another trusted proxy suggestion (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal] (Wednesday, 20 November)
RE: A proposal (Wednesday, 20 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: A proposal (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Monday, 18 November)
Re: something I don't get about the current plan... (Monday, 18 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Sunday, 10 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Sunday, 10 November)
Re: Rough minutes (Wednesday, 6 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Monday, 7 October)

Zhong Yu

Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Monday, 25 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: I revised the pro/contra document (Sunday, 24 November)
Re: A proposal (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: RFC1918 + localhost (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: A proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra (Sunday, 17 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Friday, 15 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Cookie crumbling (Tuesday, 22 October)
Re: HTTP response cacheability and query components (Friday, 18 October)

陈智昌

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Tuesday, 17 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 15 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Saturday, 14 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Thursday, 12 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 10 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Friday, 6 December)
https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/329 - Flow control window overflow (Friday, 6 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: 2014 Meeting planning (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Proxy User Stories (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: 2014 Meeting planning (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Thursday, 5 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Default stream priority (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: Some HTTP 2.0 questions (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Wednesday, 4 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? (Tuesday, 3 December)
Re: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 (Thursday, 28 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security (Wednesday, 13 November)
Re: idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Monday, 4 November)
Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0? (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Question on flow control for a single file transfer (Sunday, 3 November)
Re: Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Monday, 28 October)
Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities (Monday, 28 October)
on/about a stream, frame ordering (Monday, 21 October)
https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Advice (Wednesday, 16 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Wednesday, 9 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Wednesday, 9 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: Frame Type 8 (Saturday, 5 October)
Re: Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade (Saturday, 5 October)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 December 2013 14:36:32 UTC