W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:36:08 +0100
Message-ID: <527A61E8.2050309@gmx.de>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-06 16:27, James M Snell wrote:
> Whether and how a server surfaces links is undefined by this spec. There
> are cases where exposing the link would be wholly unnecessary. There are
> also cases where the server could significantly alter or augment the
> established link with additional detail. My goal with this spec is only
> to define the method characteristics.

I have no problem with that, but in the end something needs to come out 
that is usable.

I agree that the server may want to alter/augment the links. Maybe the 
response body then should reflect what was set?

> Regarding the main question about whether or not to include target
> attributes in the uniqueness constraint, the question becomes: which
> target attributes should be considered?

All of them?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 15:36:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC