W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: question about :authority header field

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:58:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVv3XrOja-mYSe928=koJ64ggVGWQY7Pm0Vc1T_HNoG2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 29 October 2013 10:57, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> wrote:
> This is linked to issue #294: if we want to encourage implementations to omit host, we should probably leave it out of the static header table.

Encouraging avoidance doesn't mean that we should penalize it.  Adding
Host to the table probably doesn't have a huge impact, but I see no
reason not to add it.
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 17:59:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC