Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security

On 13 Nov 2013, at 7:03 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

>> 745	4) Requre secure underlying protocol for HTTP/2.0 (at least in web browsing)
>> 746	
>> 747	[ weaker for can't live with ]
> 
> Are you saying that 4) == C), and that 4) was about using https only?

In a nutshell, yes.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 11:43:41 UTC