W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #305 Header ordering

From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:51:27 +0000
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <e7ce2528ff6341abaaef64ea50b3fa4a@BY2PR03MB091.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Our RFC2616bis says this:

The order in which header fields with the same field name are received is therefore significant to the interpretation of the combined field value; a proxy MUST NOT change the order of these field values when forwarding a message.

If 1.1 says that order is always significant and we're not supposed to be changing 1.1 semantics....

Sent from Windows Mail

From: Amos Jeffries<mailto:squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Sent: ?Friday?, ?November? ?22?, ?2013 ?6?:?22? ?AM
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org<mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 22/11/2013 4:37 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> To be clear - what makes me somewhat comfortable with this approach is that the default is that order is preserved; only if you know that ordering *is* insignificant are you allowed to break it up.


Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 16:51:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC