W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:58:26 +0800
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5C8ACA51-35EC-4B43-8F05-A9C3888016B4@mnot.net>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>

On 14 Nov 2013, at 1:43 pm, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> wrote:

> Consider that today we could deploy a commercial web server and a commercial web browser on the radio network, and they will operate in a rule-compliant manner as long as we use http. It would be a shame if those commercial products stopped working for us.

Fair enough. 

The Web server can still deploy HTTP/1 over http:// URIs, and browsers (commercial or not) should be supporting that for a long, long time.

There’s some notion that browsers might support HTTP/2 for http:// URIs when it’s *not* the “general/open” Internet; it sounds like your use case might fall into this bucket.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 05:58:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC