- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:52:37 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-10-15 23:33, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 15 October 2013 14:24, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >>> Yes. Adding "on the server" and an example would definitely help. >> >> Seems like a reasonable editorial clarification to me. > > It's low cost and improves comprehension. SGTM. Added "on the server" and mentioned in the already existing example that response codes might vary for repeated requests: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2427> Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 10:53:08 UTC