W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

#501, was: Does idempotence include the response codes?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:52:37 +0200
Message-ID: <525E6FF5.7020901@gmx.de>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-10-15 23:33, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 15 October 2013 14:24, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>> Yes. Adding "on the server" and an example would definitely help.
>>
>> Seems like a reasonable editorial clarification to me.
>
> It's low cost and improves comprehension.  SGTM.

Added "on the server" and mentioned in the already existing example that 
response codes might vary for repeated requests: 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2427>

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 10:53:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC