- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:57:35 +0100
- To: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Le Ven 6 décembre 2013 07:05, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > No train wreck or problems there. *provided* we get a clear consensus > and definition of what 2.0 proxies etc is to do with those > unknown/future frame types. Security people will ask to drop anything unknown since if it's unknown it can't be evaluated for malfeasance potential. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 08:58:15 UTC