W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Default stream priority

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:13:54 +0000
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <em84e090ca-f268-4689-a4ed-c5daaca768c6@bodybag>

seems nuts to me to allow so many priority levels.

Think about how someone will implement this.... probably some sort of 
multiple queue or buckets.  You're not going to make 2 billion buckets.  
Probably 8 different priority levels even would be more than is needed.


------ Original Message ------
From: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
To: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 5/12/2013 10:49:00 a.m.
Subject: Re: Default stream priority
>What's the goal here? To make the default be low, but not the lowest 
>priority?
>
>
>On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Martin Thomson 
><martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Looks like my math was off again...
>>
>>I got an email this morning pointing out that with the high bit
>>reserved, a default priority of 2^30 is actually the lowest priority.
>>
>>Is there any reason that this can't be changed to 2^29?  i.e.,
>>0x20000000 rather than the current 0x40000000.
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 22:14:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC