W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:13:06 +0000
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57783.1384719186@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <5c8i891ufcgcljeblec314pm868deph6h6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>, Bjoer
n Hoehrmann writes:

>I understood the comment as saying that the point does not belong on
>a "pro and contra" list, which seems fair enough in this instance. 

Why is having your protocol banned in USA or China not a "con" ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 20:13:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC