W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:19:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNd6jkeJBt27GGubSozmgZfKxBSRR8vVmq52qosbF_uhGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
You're mischaracterizing.

The Http/2 spec includes mechanisms for using it without encryption.

Encryption, however, is mandatory for web deployment across the internet in
reality because of the difficulty in achieving reliable communications.
That is just the way it is. Not my fault. :)

-=R
On Nov 14, 2013 10:05 AM, "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
wrote:

>
> Le Jeu 14 novembre 2013 18:49, Roberto Peon a écrit :
>
> > Your larger problem is not that http2 will do encryption, but rather that
> > sites are choosing to use https. No protocol change or spec change can
> > protect the HAM community from that sea-change.
>
> That would be more convincing without the frantic attempts to make tls
> mandatory instead of relying on web site choices…
>
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot
>
>
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 20:20:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC