W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults

From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:59:18 +0200
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20131210105918.GA21885@LK-Perkele-VII>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 02:11:16PM -0800, Ted Hardie wrote:

> If an explicit proxy can only tell a client on
> a per destination basis that it doesn't support CONNECT, using it will mean
> a big performance penalty much of the time.

I don't see immediately why it would need more than 1 client-proxy RTT, which
should be quite fast in most cases...

Maybe mobile environments where transmitting has big latency?

-Ilari
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 10:59:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC