W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies?

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:24:44 +0100
Message-ID: <c69cf035a973fc15ba4d3297f2b3b79a.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Salvatore Loreto" <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Jeu 12 décembre 2013 17:14, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit :
> In message <34ada50c72b7ec498dd9745d59b4c3be.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>,
> "Nicol
> as Mailhot" writes:
>
>>That's where e2e integrity comes into play (and as end-user I'd
>>like to have it too). Besides that's a major part of reassuring users
>>nothing fishy is going on behind their back
>
> And as usual, once you start pulling on a single loose thread, you
> find out that it's tied to all the turtles:
>
> What good is e2e integrity, if you don't know who the other 'e' is ?

sure, but it's no better or worse than what exists in tls today, and tls
was good enough for most of the people that didn't want intermediaries to
tamper with content



-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 16:25:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC