- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:10:28 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2013-11-19 06:23, Eliot Lear wrote: > Roberto, > > On 11/18/13 6:09 PM, Roberto Peon wrote: >> >> So... I'm hoping for this thread to affirm or debate the following >> things: >> >> a) we cannot effectively impose changes on already deployed >> infrastructure or content > > I think the word "impose" is a bit imposing. We cannot assume today > that deployed infrastructure will magically upgrade to new features > overnight. That's different from saying we can never assume that > upgrades will occur. > > Eliot Whereas I think its on the right track, even if a little harsh. * We cannot impose/force changes to improve things * We can encourage or educate for upgrades and improvement Many of these are problems only for the initial days/months/years of rollout, but the base specification needs to include a long-term (10+ year) view for dealing with the network state when these things have been resolved. +1 from me on the whole initial list as written. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 00:10:56 UTC