W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #305 Header ordering

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:05:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfd-4ME_WGaOAgxHsG8vPys-_yW=T_4jHNSB=F+DV=OUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Muahahahaha!
no.
:)
-=R


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 21 November 2013 14:59, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I suspect we'll both remain biased towards each of #1 and #3.
> > Thankfully, in either case the marginal difference is small and both #1
> and
> > #3 are substantially better than #2.
>
> Yep.  Time for RFC 3929 procedures.  No sense in restricting all the
> fun in RTCWEB to just that group.
>
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 23:06:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC