W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt

From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:32:10 -0500
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <EB1061CD-E2C5-4288-BD18-B692ED9EC389@apple.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Eliot,

On Dec 18, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> ...
>> I.e., we're not required to make HTTP/2 a replacement for HTTP/1 *in the market*, as such; only to make the specs suitable for it. 
> 
> To answer your other question and the charter, since you went there, I
> don't really see a net benefit for most non-browser uses.  We've limited

From a resource perspective alone I think multiplexing requests over a single connection is a major win for any HTTP-based RPC protocol (IPP, SOAP, REST, etc.) where you expect to send or receive more than one message.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair



Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 15:32:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC