W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies?

From: Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:36:33 +0200
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP234C324D307AE26B10F1732B1D50@phx.gbl>
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
CC: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I like this discovery process. It's all in HTTP. The only downside is 
that it requires plaintext HTTP to work. I'm assuming that 
http://awebsite.com should not be the real site that the user is trying 
to view, but some specific site that the browser vendor keeps available 
just for testing for proxies with HTTP. You can't use the site that the 
user used, because that might be HTTPS.

You will get pushback on #5, though.

On 3/12/13 3:16 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Mar 3 décembre 2013 12:24, Yoav Nir a écrit :
>
>
> 5. Prompt the user:
>
> Accept using gateway-name to access http://awebsite.com/ and other web
> sites in ingoing-http2-mode ?
>
> [check reformatted access rules] [see help page] [see certificate]
>
>    [ ] Prompt for other web sites and security modes
>    ( ) only for this session ( ) all the time
>    (*) only from here        ( ) everywhere
>                                           [Yes] [No]
>
>
My mother would call me if she got that. My daughter would quickly learn 
that clicking "Yes" after unchecking the "Prompt" box and selecting 
"everywhere" makes the prompt go away and not come back. IOW it would 
make the Internet work.

Yoav

(or my mother could call my daughter and get her advice...)





Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 13:37:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC