W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 21:07:43 +0100
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5c8i891ufcgcljeblec314pm868deph6h6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>In message <CABaLYCuBgBZWZR1dY7_mkHVSrLBncyb=8M6kjKvD4+ZH0eqCCw@mail.gmail.com>
>, Mike Belshe writes:
>
>>'runs a risk of' is not a pro or con.
>
>First, I wrote "runs a very big risk of", and second I have a very
>hard time wrapping my head around how an IETF WG could consider that
>a "pro" argument, so please enlighten me ?

I understood the comment as saying that the point does not belong on
a "pro and contra" list, which seems fair enough in this instance. 
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 20:08:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC