- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:57:02 +0100
- To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range.all@tools.ietf.org
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
On 2013-10-30 08:46, S Moonesamy wrote: > ... >> Such as? > > What I mean is that what happens is undefined when both sides do not > follow the RFC 2119 "should". The response is self-descriptive, so it's up to the client to properly process it. >> It is supposed to be interpreted per RFC 2119. > > It is better to use the uppercase words after the RFC 2119 boilerplate. But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this? Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 08:57:35 UTC