W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:57:02 +0100
Message-ID: <5270C9DE.3000104@gmx.de>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range.all@tools.ietf.org
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
On 2013-10-30 08:46, S Moonesamy wrote:
> ...
>> Such as?
>
> What I mean is that what happens is undefined when both sides do not
> follow the RFC 2119 "should".

The response is self-descriptive, so it's up to the client to properly 
process it.

>> It is supposed to be interpreted per RFC 2119.
>
> It is better to use the uppercase words after the RFC 2119 boilerplate.

But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the 
Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 08:57:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC