W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: something I don't get about the current plan...

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 18:10:22 +0100
Message-ID: <5288F87E.3080301@gmx.de>
To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-17 17:53, Mike Belshe wrote:
> OK - I see.
>
> I think you're mixing current stats (only 30% of sites today have certs
> - seems high?) with incompatibilities - 100% of sites can get certs
> today if they want them.  So HTTP/2 requiring certs would not be
> introducing any technical incompatibility (like running on port 100 would).
>
> Mike

So we are optimistic that servers can be fixed to use proper certs, but 
pessimistic that bugs in middleware will be fixed?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 17:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC