- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:49:37 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2013-11-14 18:49, Roberto Peon wrote: >> >> There is a means of opting out, however, which exists and is widely >> deployed: http1 > > > And the WG has a mandate to develop a replacement for 1.1, called 2.0. If we > do not indent to develop that protocol anymore, we should re-charter. > Very emphatic +1. So far the general sentiment of those pushing for TLS-only seems to be "If you don't want to be forced to use TLS, tough, you don't get to play with us then". That's not going to work. - James > >> There was near unanimity at the plenary that we should do something >> about pervasive monitoring, and while I don't believe that there were >> any actuonable , unambiguous dieectuves , the spirit of the room was >> quite clear. The IETF intends to attempt to do something about this. > > > Yes. What we disagree on what that means for HTTP: URIs. > >> ... > > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 18:50:25 UTC