W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [Gen-art] spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:42:01 +0000
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7DE54881-F743-4D93-B502-4C2694C8EC59@piuha.net>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Meral, Julian,

> Hi Julian,
>   I agree that it may be too late to make drastic changes. Please consider the below comments though, it may help:
> 
> "
> Constructive comment: 
>     -Perhaps in part 1 give a suggestion on how to use/read these documents (RFCs). Could any of them be skipped at first for a simple implementation? I think it is worthwhile spending minimum 2-3 pages to summarize the various documents (Parts) and suggest how to use them best.
> "

FWIW, I think this would be useful.

Jari
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 18:46:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC