W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:13:52 +0100
Message-ID: <cf8abc55e40074798d40fc131e73dd5b.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Bruce Perens" <bruce@perens.com>

Le Jeu 14 novembre 2013 10:19, Roberto Peon a écrit :
> On Nov 13, 2013 11:09 PM, "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>

>> There have still not been any explanation why traffic must be 100%
>> encrypted. People do not wear black balaclavas by default in real life
>> just in case a CCTV camera or a Google car passes by.
> Are you not current with the news about pervasive monitoring?

Are you not current with the way CCTV cameras have mushroomed everywhere,
Google cars capture passer-bys and *people* *don't* *care* (and when they
care the solution is legislation like European privacy laws, not technical
constrains. Please fix your laws if you don't like them don't foster
technical limits on everyone else).

Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 10:14:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC