W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

RE: #305 Header ordering

From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:57:58 +0000
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6C71876BDCCD01488E70A2399529D5E52F52AB83@ADELE.crf.canon.fr>
+1

I like both #1 and #3 proposals, with a preference for #3 as it doesn't introduce any new mechanism.
Not using #2 means that we will be able to drop some emission ordering stuff from HPACK.

Hervé.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@treenet.co.nz]
> Sent: vendredi 22 novembre 2013 15:20
> To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: #305 Header ordering
> 
> On 22/11/2013 4:37 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > To be clear - what makes me somewhat comfortable with this approach is
> that the default is that order is preserved; only if you know that ordering *is*
> insignificant are you allowed to break it up.
> >
> 
> +1.
> 
> Amos
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 16:59:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC