W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Questions about ALPN

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:20:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWCuFr3rtWX=ERGtok-TujzHq8K+U8gKPFcA9PNsaZ=Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Cc: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 28 October 2013 14:12, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Except that, as I understand the proposal Martin is referring to, it's a single hash of the (multiple) protocol IDs you support.  It very substantially changes ALPN's matching model, or at the very least adds a second layer.

The major change is that P[response] is not a strict subset of
P[request].  So, yes.
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 21:20:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC