W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies?

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:18:35 +0100
Message-ID: <d0636c7cceec46896e3fafb4913f8a84.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "James M Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "ChanWilliam(陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Mer 4 décembre 2013 02:31, James M Snell a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com> wrote:
>> The fact that everyone does it does not mean it's a good thing or that
>> we
>> should do it more.
>
> Agreed. My point was not to argue that it was a good thing as much as
> it was to point out that the UX is not something we need to solve
> here, at least not right away... Beating the "perfect is the enemy of
> good" drum once again.. perhaps for the time being putting some
> security decisions into the hands of users is acceptable, at least
> until the UX folks figure out a better way.

Yes, the protocol needs to be clean enough web clients can build whatever
UI they feel is best, embodying whatever policies they want to apply by
default at a time (because those things have been known to evolve over
time)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 09:19:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC