W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:18:29 +0000
To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57436.1384715909@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABaLYCuBgBZWZR1dY7_mkHVSrLBncyb=8M6kjKvD4+ZH0eqCCw@mail.gmail.com>
, Mike Belshe writes:

>'runs a risk of' is not a pro or con.

First, I wrote "runs a very big risk of", and second I have a very
hard time wrapping my head around how an IETF WG could consider that
a "pro" argument, so please enlighten me ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 19:18:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC