W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/329 - Flow control window overflow

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:54:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXTHe0+P_N+6BVxJBazUEjw=+hqwRMk=wftfheiMKyzSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
On 6 December 2013 11:42, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hasan is in favor of GOAWAY, and FWIW I agree.

I think that a stream error would potentially cause problems with
connection-level flow control if you aren't careful.  It seems better
to err on the side of caution.

> Presumably Hasan will use the FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR status code here, but I dunno.

That sounds fine, though I don't like to second-guess Hasan.  Maybe
the code he chooses will be covered in awesome.
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 19:54:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC