W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:11:14 +0000
To: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com>
Cc: "HTTP Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <emc2f55254-580c-4bce-92b6-ee68ea49ae59@bodybag>

I had some thoughts about this.

Chrome has the "incognito" frame.  You could use a different browser 
frame.


------ Original Message ------
From: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com>
Cc: "HTTP Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 27/11/2013 7:47:40 a.m.
Subject: Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion
>On 26 November 2013 04:16, Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com> wrote:
>>  This allows adding some clever UX that shows the user what device is
>>  on-path, and also allows pre-configuring the trusted proxy based on 
>>name.
>
>I'm interested in learning what that clever UX looks like. A lot hinges 
>on it.
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:11:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC