W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #305 Header ordering

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:58:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXy53+nrnmMV2+YTVoMiz8Hh+ESV4CDG0-Myu4vm5qTdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 November 2013 19:36, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:34 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do we (yet) have a list of all the registered header fields for which
>> order is insignificant?
>
> So far, the ones I know about are cookie and setcookie, but mainly because
> those are the ones that I care about.

More importantly, those are the ones that are *special*.  Neither uses
the standard list construction form and thus require special handling.
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 17:58:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC