W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding

From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:01:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPyZ6=LGGCm+CbdimUw_8G+R5kp83C2FUcQLCQL-KA2jUu4_Cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Hervé Ruellan <ruellan.crf@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thank you for clarifying that.
I feel it would be good to state explicitly that sender of SETTINGS without
ACK applies its change on the reception of SETTINGS with ACK, because, as I
understand, while the draft 07 states about the timing of application for
receiver,  it does not for the sender.

Best regards,
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa

2013/10/27 7:04 "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>:
>
> Yes yes. :)
>
> On Oct 26, 2013 1:37 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> On 26 October 2013 09:17, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The decoder may then allocate/deallocate state (depending on the
direction
>> > of the change, upwards vs downwards) when it receives the ACK.
>>
>>
>> Not "may", MUST.  Otherwise it doesn't work ;)
Received on Sunday, 27 October 2013 04:01:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC