W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:03:21 -0600
Message-ID: <CACuKZqGexydXUMN1trbK91p+UapR_N_fSz5F86E2_rP3Hj7deg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
You are right. I used an inappropriate word, you spotted it and my
whole argument collapses.

So, what are we going to tell people about the security of HTTP/2.0?



On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/17/2013 03:54 PM, Zhong Yu wrote:
>> Is HTTP/2.0 going to promise people that their conversations are now
>> unbreakable?
>
> Terms like unbreakable are irrelevant here. Anyone who makes any
> such claim, or uses any such claim to argue anything, is talking
> nonsense from a security point of view.
>
> Neither the opponents of, nor proponents for, more use of TLS
> gain anything with such bogus arguments.
>
> S.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 16:03:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC