- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:35:58 +0100
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- CC: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-17 23:50, Roberto Peon wrote: > Securing the user<->home-router interaction is mostly orthogonal from > using HTTP or HTTP2. It is something people do today with 1.1. > On the charter thing: > Where does the charter mandate that we must replace HTTP/1.1 in every > use-case? Here: > It is expected that HTTP/2.0 will: > ... > * Retain the semantics of HTTP/1.1, leveraging existing documentation (see > above), including (but not limited to) HTTP methods, status codes, URIs, and > where appropriate, header fields. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 08:36:41 UTC