W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: something I don't get about the current plan...

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:35:58 +0100
Message-ID: <5289D16E.7010306@gmx.de>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-17 23:50, Roberto Peon wrote:
> Securing the user<->home-router interaction is mostly orthogonal from
> using HTTP or HTTP2.

It is something people do today with 1.1.

> On the charter thing:
> Where does the charter mandate that we must replace HTTP/1.1 in every
> use-case?

Here:

>   It is expected that HTTP/2.0 will:
> ...
>   * Retain the semantics of HTTP/1.1, leveraging existing documentation (see
>     above), including (but not limited to) HTTP methods, status codes, URIs, and
>     where appropriate, header fields.
> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 08:36:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC