W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Our ALPN protocol IDs

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:43:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWmDm4Sfg1bcxOQ==CNX5Vg8-xhwAxSjBrg58LBRDG06A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 5 December 2013 13:20, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
> by current definitions of what constitutes minor vs major version numbers,
> 2.1 would be compatible with 2.2.  If it isn't you'll call it 3.0.

We lost strong ties to that convention when we dumped the version
field from the protocol.  We can, if we like, choose new conventions
for 2 and onward.
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 22:43:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC