W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0?

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:33:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNq4szorzSjD27qV_ag6jfiUfQ4F2+FEcoSQkHCEFSAi2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
On Nov 3, 2013 11:20 AM, "Peter Lepeska" <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A related point...uploading and downloading large numbers of data frames
over the same connection is problematic b/c the WINDOW_UPDATE frames will
get blocked behind data frames in each direction,

Hopefully not. Just use small frame sizes so you can inject update at
will.. Using small frames and not over buffering is pretty much always
needed to make priority mux work.

Bufferbloat at a lower layer is a problem.. But its the same problem for a
2 TCP flow alternative
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 21:33:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC