W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:39:58 +0100
Message-ID: <5285DDDE.2080409@gmx.de>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-15 09:00, Roberto Peon wrote:
> There is explicitly an option for unencrypted HTTP/2, but not over the
> "open" internet, since that is known/provent to be unreliable.
>
> And in my personal opinion, HTTP is a poor mechanism for cached content:
> it allows for a very limited distribution model and (amongst other
> things) doesn't adequately differentiate between resources that should
> be public, but verifiably unmodified, and private resources.
 > ...

Cache-Control?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 08:40:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC