W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 23:33:54 +0100
Message-ID: <013112f16a341f08112db9a42d36dbd4.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Le Dim 17 novembre 2013 15:20, Yoav Nir a écrit :
> On 17/11/13 2:16 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> 2. it's disingenuous to claim tackling pervasive surveillance when
>> nothing is done for the cookie networks whose sole aim is pervasive
>> surveillance and which *are* an http "feature" (unlike TLS which is
>> being bolted on)
> True, but all previous attempts to make cookies better have failed.
>
>   * The httpstate working group closed without standardizing "cake"
>   * Recent attempts to get websec to discuss next generation cookies
>     also failed to get people (especially browser vendors) interested.

What was wrong with the solution that was proposed on this list a few
months ago ? (by PHK IIRC)

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 22:34:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC