W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:40:46 +0100
Message-ID: <5285192E.3050207@gmx.de>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
On 2013-11-14 18:49, Roberto Peon wrote:
> There is a means of opting out, however, which exists and is widely
> deployed: http1

And the WG has a mandate to develop a replacement for 1.1, called 2.0. 
If we do not indent to develop that protocol anymore, we should re-charter.

> There was near unanimity at the plenary that we should do something
> about pervasive monitoring, and while I don't believe that there were
> any actuonable , unambiguous dieectuves , the spirit of the room was
> quite clear. The IETF intends to attempt to do something about this.

Yes. What we disagree on what that means for HTTP: URIs.

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 18:41:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC