W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: RFC1918 + localhost

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:48:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfiyjHsVj5M585GqOE6sfP4WNJBNvY=CWEBWdgQXED04g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Agreed.
-=R


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Nicolas Mailhot <
nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> wrote:

>
> Le Mar 19 novembre 2013 21:28, Roberto Peon a écrit :
> > But in many ways we don't have choice today.
> > If you are advocating for choice where both the client and any entity the
> > client connects to explicitly (potentially a proxy) can opt-in or opt-out
> > of encryption, then I'm with you.
> > If you are advocating for choice where the user and connected-entity get
> > no
> > say in the matter, then I'm firmly in the not-interested camp.
>
> There are three participants in the dialog and all of them need a say in
> the matter (and sometimes there will be no agreement and any of the three
> participants can decide to refuse the connexion)
>
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 08:49:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC