W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: A proposal

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 21:09:53 +0000
To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57977.1384722593@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CACuKZqHKjpvgu=TOGsG6FVKtVnJnom1pn8FnuWit9XraW-JM-w@mail.gmail.com>
, Zhong Yu writes:

>If a URL is http://something, it better means that the document can be
>retrieved by HTTP/1 on clear TCP. If that assumption is broken, a lot
>of software will be broken.

No, it means "fetch this with HTTP", it doesn't say "HTTP/1" anywhere
and if the user-agent determines that it can be fetched better with
HTTP/2 on port 100, then that's just fine.

Now, if a port number is specified, things get more hairy, and that
could be documented as a way to insist on a particular HTTP version
if my proposal is adopted.

Poul-Henning

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 21:10:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC