Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0

Oh yea, nearly forgot.
I believe the 'end of message' bit, currently reserved in the data frame
would work well for this.
-=R


On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that is what James was proposing as well.
> I'd love to see that-- it shouldn't be rocket science, and it may as well
> be done if we're ever going to do it.
> -=R
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-05 08:52, Roberto Peon wrote:
>>
>>> This works assuming no http/1 gateway somewhere.
>>> Mime/multipart  has always been particularly annoying, though.
>>>
>>> -=R
>>>
>>
>> I'd prefer to replace multipart by an easier-to-process binary format
>> that could be used in HTTP/1.1 as well.
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>>
>

Received on Saturday, 5 October 2013 08:39:08 UTC