W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 01:38:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfZGEQUpyQbZnwDtS4dhmN2YSVegS_17szywS_uuqXjSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Oh yea, nearly forgot.
I believe the 'end of message' bit, currently reserved in the data frame
would work well for this.
-=R


On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that is what James was proposing as well.
> I'd love to see that-- it shouldn't be rocket science, and it may as well
> be done if we're ever going to do it.
> -=R
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-05 08:52, Roberto Peon wrote:
>>
>>> This works assuming no http/1 gateway somewhere.
>>> Mime/multipart  has always been particularly annoying, though.
>>>
>>> -=R
>>>
>>
>> I'd prefer to replace multipart by an easier-to-process binary format
>> that could be used in HTTP/1.1 as well.
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 5 October 2013 08:39:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC